Leconfield Village Hall Pedestrian Entrance Report

Usage of Mobility Aids

Total respondents: 64. Multiple selections were allowed. Most selected option: ‘None of the above’ with 38 selections.

Visit Frequency

Total respondents: 64. Multiple selections were allowed. Most selected option: ‘More than once a week’ with 22 selections.

Transportation Modes

Total respondents: 64. Multiple selections were allowed. Most selected option: ‘On foot’ with 56 selections.

Preferred Entrance

Total respondents: 64. Multiple selections were allowed. Most selected option: ‘Both entrances’ with 27 selections.

Opinions on Pedestrian Entrance

Total respondents: 64. Multiple selections were allowed. Most selected option: ‘I would be more likely to use the pedestrian entrance if it was safer to cross the road’ with 37 selections.

Age Groups

Total respondents: 64. Multiple selections were allowed. Most selected option: ’25-65′ with 48 selections.

Family Group Size

Total respondents: 64. Multiple selections were allowed. Most selected option: ‘3-4’ with 32 selections.

Community Feedback Summary

Key Themes from Community Feedback:

Safety Concerns and Crossing Suggestions:
– Zebra crossings and pedestrian traffic lights were widely suggested to improve safety, especially for children.
– Visibility improvements such as cutting hedges and redesigning fencing were recommended.

Traffic Calming Measures:
– Suggestions included reducing the speed limit to 20mph and installing more effective speed bumps.
– Some proposed chicanes and better road design to slow traffic.

Infrastructure Enhancements:
– Extending pathways and redesigning fences to improve visibility and safety were common ideas.

Community Frustration:
– Many residents expressed concern over speeding, tailgating, and the use of the road as a rat run.

Engagement and Transparency:
– Questions about funding and implementation were raised, and the Parish Council responded with clarifications.

Leave a comment